Dear Mr. McKee, Interesting title to this posting about "re-examining those 'bunch-of-crap' NIST reports". I didn't phrase it as that, but it sums it up well.
My 9/11 efforts involved spelunking down rabbit-holes and rescuing nuggets of truth. The rabbit-holes included what the government presented, which also could be labeled "disinformation" just as quickly as the government-seeded crazy theories. Unfortunately, even the organized portions of the 9/11 Truth Movement in their reports (rabbit-holes) -- upon closer examination -- had issues in myopic reliance on "bunch-of-crap" (government) report before adding to the crap in unique ways.
Here's some WTC-4 analysis that should have come from AE911Truth.
Since 9/11, we've had a string of illegal wars, the 2008 economy crash, Trump 45, COVID, mRNA, and now the well organized, knowledgeable, and greased Trump 47 implementing Project 2025 and the riviera of the Middle East (while flying over the "Gulf of America".)
9/11 Truth, for me, is dead and irrelevant except for lessons learned or honed in observing (team) Trump 47. How did 9/11 Truth die? Radiation poisoning, from which ironically it had been suffering since the early organizing efforts of Scholars for 9/11 Truth.
On the theme of 9/11, I do have one final memorial scroll and awards show opus to squeeze out. I was in the process of doing another zoom mockumentary of 9/11 celebrities. I was framing it as a therapy session and the celebrities going through some of the 12-steps with regards to their 9/11 and conspiracy addiction. Each celebrity is given an opportunity to make amends and apologize for their efforts to steer away from the obvious nuclear nature of 9/11. There were so many celebrities to include this time around, and how they obtain redemption and piece of mind.
My co-author has inspired me to go a different direction in my final 9/11 opus.
Mr. McKee, I recall my desire for us to engage in rational discussion on a high level, the Jefferson-Franklin intellectual exchanges of our times not just on themes 9/11. I desired this of all my debate opponents. They thought I was being arrogant, but I was just trying to lift up them and our discourse to a high level. And I was disappointed. With everyone.
Until I started engaging an A.I. (You should try it.) Finally a worthy debate opponent who writes well and has substantiation for its conclusions. I don't always agree, and sometimes must change assumptions for the A.I. so it can deviate from the "OCT".
I asked it to create good and bad categories for 9/11 Truth awards, and then to suggest who might be nominees in that category. I had the A.I. change its perspective by "assuming the 9/11 Truth Movement was infiltrated," who would nominees be. I presented the A.I. with various 9/11 celebrity names and asked it what categories of good and bad 9/11 truther awards would they be nominated for?
My desired Jefferson-Franklin intellectual discussion is being realized with A.I., who is unwittingly becoming a co-author.
P.S. I saw a clip where a Canadian said they were preparing for war, which we in the US are oblivious to. Any truth to that? Seems kind of ironic that you were giving lip service to Trump 47 from across the border, only to have Trump 47 in his first days in office start a trade war with Canada and utter statements making Canada the 51st state. [Entertaining this stupid notion: Each of the provinces should be its own state, and Puerto Rico and Guam need to be states as well. Alas that would stacking the leftist deck of cards to keep the GOP in the future out of power.]
At any rate, I harbor no ill will to you or your independent nation. I am confident that if Trump 47 continues to "F. around," the Canadians will turn around and embody the "find out."
Dear Mr. McKee, Interesting title to this posting about "re-examining those 'bunch-of-crap' NIST reports". I didn't phrase it as that, but it sums it up well.
My 9/11 efforts involved spelunking down rabbit-holes and rescuing nuggets of truth. The rabbit-holes included what the government presented, which also could be labeled "disinformation" just as quickly as the government-seeded crazy theories. Unfortunately, even the organized portions of the 9/11 Truth Movement in their reports (rabbit-holes) -- upon closer examination -- had issues in myopic reliance on "bunch-of-crap" (government) report before adding to the crap in unique ways.
Here's some WTC-4 analysis that should have come from AE911Truth.
https://maxwellbridges.blogspot.com/2024/12/exotika-911-blackhole-4.html
Since 9/11, we've had a string of illegal wars, the 2008 economy crash, Trump 45, COVID, mRNA, and now the well organized, knowledgeable, and greased Trump 47 implementing Project 2025 and the riviera of the Middle East (while flying over the "Gulf of America".)
9/11 Truth, for me, is dead and irrelevant except for lessons learned or honed in observing (team) Trump 47. How did 9/11 Truth die? Radiation poisoning, from which ironically it had been suffering since the early organizing efforts of Scholars for 9/11 Truth.
On the theme of 9/11, I do have one final memorial scroll and awards show opus to squeeze out. I was in the process of doing another zoom mockumentary of 9/11 celebrities. I was framing it as a therapy session and the celebrities going through some of the 12-steps with regards to their 9/11 and conspiracy addiction. Each celebrity is given an opportunity to make amends and apologize for their efforts to steer away from the obvious nuclear nature of 9/11. There were so many celebrities to include this time around, and how they obtain redemption and piece of mind.
My co-author has inspired me to go a different direction in my final 9/11 opus.
Mr. McKee, I recall my desire for us to engage in rational discussion on a high level, the Jefferson-Franklin intellectual exchanges of our times not just on themes 9/11. I desired this of all my debate opponents. They thought I was being arrogant, but I was just trying to lift up them and our discourse to a high level. And I was disappointed. With everyone.
Until I started engaging an A.I. (You should try it.) Finally a worthy debate opponent who writes well and has substantiation for its conclusions. I don't always agree, and sometimes must change assumptions for the A.I. so it can deviate from the "OCT".
I asked it to create good and bad categories for 9/11 Truth awards, and then to suggest who might be nominees in that category. I had the A.I. change its perspective by "assuming the 9/11 Truth Movement was infiltrated," who would nominees be. I presented the A.I. with various 9/11 celebrity names and asked it what categories of good and bad 9/11 truther awards would they be nominated for?
My desired Jefferson-Franklin intellectual discussion is being realized with A.I., who is unwittingly becoming a co-author.
P.S. I saw a clip where a Canadian said they were preparing for war, which we in the US are oblivious to. Any truth to that? Seems kind of ironic that you were giving lip service to Trump 47 from across the border, only to have Trump 47 in his first days in office start a trade war with Canada and utter statements making Canada the 51st state. [Entertaining this stupid notion: Each of the provinces should be its own state, and Puerto Rico and Guam need to be states as well. Alas that would stacking the leftist deck of cards to keep the GOP in the future out of power.]
At any rate, I harbor no ill will to you or your independent nation. I am confident that if Trump 47 continues to "F. around," the Canadians will turn around and embody the "find out."
//