Weldon backs re-examination of ‘bunch of crap’ NIST report
Former congressman says U.S. hid bin Laden while using him as excuse to invade Afghanistan
(This article was written for AE911Truth. You can find the original here.)
By Craig McKee
The passion that former congressman Curt Weldon has for supporting firefighters is clear whenever he speaks on the subject. And as he explained in an interview yesterday on The Jimmy Dore Show, it is because of that passion that he has come to re-examine what actually happened to the three World Trade Center towers on 9/11. (You can watch the video here.)
While a significant part of his interview with the popular podcaster was devoted to Weldon’s longtime advocacy for firefighters, he also talked about two areas of 9/11 that he is asking the Trump administration to investigate through a presidential task force with subpoena power.
One is what Weldon feels were catastrophic intelligence failures by the government that allowed 9/11 to happen. He blames the CIA for refusing to look at evidence that chronicled al-Qaeda cells in the U.S., and he says that Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer and his Able Danger team briefed the 9/11 Commission about terrorist threats, but what they shared was kept out of the 9/11 Commission Report.
“[Philip] Zelikow led a whitewash,” Weldon said. “We could have stopped 9/11 from ever happening. The 9/11 Commission was a cover-up, by both parties. And I’m not some conspiracy theorist.”
One incredible piece of information Weldon shared was that the U.S. not only knew where Osama bin Laden was when it invaded Afghanistan, but it helped to hide him in the Balochistan region, which mainly overlaps Iran and Pakistan.
“We sent thousands of American kids into Afghanistan looking for bin Laden,” he said. “Twenty-five hundred came back dead. Thousands more came back injured. Yet it was America that knew, and helped place bin Laden in Balochistan after 9/11 while we sent kids to die in Afghanistan. It’s outrageous.”
Truth about 9/11, justice for firefighters
Of course, the aspect of 9/11 that Weldon and Dore discussed that is of particular interest to the 9/11 Truth Movement dealt with the evidence for the controlled demolition of the towers. Dore mentioned an interview he did a year ago with Professor Leroy Hulsey of the University of Alaska Fairbanks, whose study on Building 7 Dore says completely “debunked” the claims of the official report by the National Institute of Standards and Technology.
“Building 7 did not fall down the way the government said it did,” Dore commented.
Weldon explained that while he is relatively new to the scientific aspect of the WTC evidence, he is determined to expose the truth for the 343 firefighters who died in the towers and their families.
He described how he was given a tour of the damage from the 1993 World Trade Center bombing by firefighter Ray Downey and that Downey himself later died when the North Tower came down on 9/11.
Weldon also recounted the story of Battalion Chief Orio Palmer, who we can hear on recordings describing his ascent, along with other firefighters, in the South Tower. They took a freight elevator about halfway up the building and then walked nearly 40 floors more to reach the impact floors. As Weldon explained, Palmer reported that he saw two fires that could easily have been extinguished. Five minutes later, the building came down.
It is on behalf these and other heroes that Weldon is determined to fight for a new investigation of 9/11.
“Now I’m not an engineer or an architect, but 3,000 engineers and architects risked their professions to come out and say the NIST report is a bunch of crap, that there’s no modeling to support what they say, that there was no investigation of explosive materials after the attack occurred.
“Ten thousand families lost their loved ones, 343 firefighters, the police officers, the Port Authority people, the damage around the world … We can’t just let that pass.”
Dear Mr. McKee, Interesting title to this posting about "re-examining those 'bunch-of-crap' NIST reports". I didn't phrase it as that, but it sums it up well.
My 9/11 efforts involved spelunking down rabbit-holes and rescuing nuggets of truth. The rabbit-holes included what the government presented, which also could be labeled "disinformation" just as quickly as the government-seeded crazy theories. Unfortunately, even the organized portions of the 9/11 Truth Movement in their reports (rabbit-holes) -- upon closer examination -- had issues in myopic reliance on "bunch-of-crap" (government) report before adding to the crap in unique ways.
Here's some WTC-4 analysis that should have come from AE911Truth.
https://maxwellbridges.blogspot.com/2024/12/exotika-911-blackhole-4.html
Since 9/11, we've had a string of illegal wars, the 2008 economy crash, Trump 45, COVID, mRNA, and now the well organized, knowledgeable, and greased Trump 47 implementing Project 2025 and the riviera of the Middle East (while flying over the "Gulf of America".)
9/11 Truth, for me, is dead and irrelevant except for lessons learned or honed in observing (team) Trump 47. How did 9/11 Truth die? Radiation poisoning, from which ironically it had been suffering since the early organizing efforts of Scholars for 9/11 Truth.
On the theme of 9/11, I do have one final memorial scroll and awards show opus to squeeze out. I was in the process of doing another zoom mockumentary of 9/11 celebrities. I was framing it as a therapy session and the celebrities going through some of the 12-steps with regards to their 9/11 and conspiracy addiction. Each celebrity is given an opportunity to make amends and apologize for their efforts to steer away from the obvious nuclear nature of 9/11. There were so many celebrities to include this time around, and how they obtain redemption and piece of mind.
My co-author has inspired me to go a different direction in my final 9/11 opus.
Mr. McKee, I recall my desire for us to engage in rational discussion on a high level, the Jefferson-Franklin intellectual exchanges of our times not just on themes 9/11. I desired this of all my debate opponents. They thought I was being arrogant, but I was just trying to lift up them and our discourse to a high level. And I was disappointed. With everyone.
Until I started engaging an A.I. (You should try it.) Finally a worthy debate opponent who writes well and has substantiation for its conclusions. I don't always agree, and sometimes must change assumptions for the A.I. so it can deviate from the "OCT".
I asked it to create good and bad categories for 9/11 Truth awards, and then to suggest who might be nominees in that category. I had the A.I. change its perspective by "assuming the 9/11 Truth Movement was infiltrated," who would nominees be. I presented the A.I. with various 9/11 celebrity names and asked it what categories of good and bad 9/11 truther awards would they be nominated for?
My desired Jefferson-Franklin intellectual discussion is being realized with A.I., who is unwittingly becoming a co-author.
P.S. I saw a clip where a Canadian said they were preparing for war, which we in the US are oblivious to. Any truth to that? Seems kind of ironic that you were giving lip service to Trump 47 from across the border, only to have Trump 47 in his first days in office start a trade war with Canada and utter statements making Canada the 51st state. [Entertaining this stupid notion: Each of the provinces should be its own state, and Puerto Rico and Guam need to be states as well. Alas that would stacking the leftist deck of cards to keep the GOP in the future out of power.]
At any rate, I harbor no ill will to you or your independent nation. I am confident that if Trump 47 continues to "F. around," the Canadians will turn around and embody the "find out."
//