(This article was written for Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. You can read the original post here.) Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. ... We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of.
I find it ironic Craig that this excellent article about Cointelpro gets comments right off the bat by two Cointelpro agents that attempt immediately to derail the discussion onto disinformation tropes such as DEW's and nukes. Of course your article has nothing to do with either of those topics. Maybe that is the point. I quote your articles last point regarding how agents behave:
"· People who claim to be truthers who distract from good evidence by pushing extreme and unfounded theories; "
In case there are any doubts about who I am accusing of derailing the discussion, I am talking about 911 Revisionist and Maxwell C. Bridges. If you look at their pattern of posting on your blog Craig I think you will see clearly that they try on almost every single article to derail the discussion onto their disinformation tropes DEW's and Nukes. Go back and look, they are almost always among the very first commenters and they rarely if ever actually address the topic of the article they are commenting on. I personally believe they are paid Cointelpro agents or perhaps sock puppets of the same paid agent. They have been assigned to you Craig so that must mean that you are doing something right. You don't get flak until you are over the target right?
I get so annoyed at the term conspiracy theory being used as derogatory. Anyone who I actually engage in this conversation with, my main points are that the level of corruption in government and big business cannot be understated at this point, regardless of which party is in charge. Therefore, your best bet is to assume everything is a lie, because it's a continual attempt to protect their corruption from exposure.
If it makes me a big bad conspiracy theorist that I disbelieve the most corrupt world governments the history of the world has ever known, then so be it. You're a f'ing idiot if you believe everything you're told.
And another thing on censorship. The truth does not need protection through censorship. Only lies do. The truth can stand up to logical attacks if it is the truth. Lies cannot. So if something is being censored, the odds are 99.999999% that it's an inconvenient truth for those doing the censoring.
The main job of the government and intelligence agencies is to protect themselves, to grow their budgets and their power. They do this through lying about everything and creating more and bigger problems that the public agrees need to be solved. And of course it's an unwritten rule that only the government can solve problems, even though they never have and only ever make them worse by design. After all, if a problem were solved, the budget used to fix it would disappear. If the problem were made worse, the budget would increase. Therefore, the government always makes problems worse on purpose. I don't know how anyone could possibly argue against this logic.
Craig - You ever considered that you've fallen for the COINTELPRO agents?
It seems you might realise that and just keep mum about it, no?
With regards to the technology used on 9/11, you are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up.
There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Why have you buried your head in the sand for the lat 12 years after writing your article, "THE JUDY WOOD ENIGMA: A DISCUSSION - A POLARIZING FIGURE IN 9/11 RESEARCH".
Thank you - I have encountered some of these tactics. I was personally slandered within a 9/11 group. As far as I could tell, the rumors centered around me as a woman. I went out to (platonic) dinner once with a 9/11 activist, after which the rumor campaign apparently started.
For years now, I've had to deal with in-person harassment also. It's still going on. It involves what Tarpley called “surveillance role players." From my limited research and FOIA attempts, I think the quote from Tarpley is correct as far as the government entities behind the harassment. There's a fusion center in a town not far from where I live. Some private companies that receive federal money participate as well. For instance, I discovered a local company owns and leases some of the vehicles driven by harassers. This company receives funding from the GSA. At this point, there are probably many small companies making money from these activities across the USA.
Thank you for this crucial information, Craig. The psychopathic tyrants will go to extreme lengths to hold onto their perceived power. And in that category, unfortunately, are their cush-job-keeping career clown "experts" who will, for example, denounce vaxxes with plenty of corroborating and/or correlational evidence, but they refuse to openly point to the 10 million pound elephant in the room, germ theory. Why? Because even *questioning* it would likely end their career as they know it. Are these "experts" actually plants, or are they just fearful? Their popularity and lasting power in the fake truther community may provide the answer. The secret agencies know full well that the average person, as you say, has learned to not question the narrative outside of accepted mainstream discussion. Ah, the incrementalism.
I find it ironic Craig that this excellent article about Cointelpro gets comments right off the bat by two Cointelpro agents that attempt immediately to derail the discussion onto disinformation tropes such as DEW's and nukes. Of course your article has nothing to do with either of those topics. Maybe that is the point. I quote your articles last point regarding how agents behave:
"· People who claim to be truthers who distract from good evidence by pushing extreme and unfounded theories; "
In case there are any doubts about who I am accusing of derailing the discussion, I am talking about 911 Revisionist and Maxwell C. Bridges. If you look at their pattern of posting on your blog Craig I think you will see clearly that they try on almost every single article to derail the discussion onto their disinformation tropes DEW's and Nukes. Go back and look, they are almost always among the very first commenters and they rarely if ever actually address the topic of the article they are commenting on. I personally believe they are paid Cointelpro agents or perhaps sock puppets of the same paid agent. They have been assigned to you Craig so that must mean that you are doing something right. You don't get flak until you are over the target right?
I get so annoyed at the term conspiracy theory being used as derogatory. Anyone who I actually engage in this conversation with, my main points are that the level of corruption in government and big business cannot be understated at this point, regardless of which party is in charge. Therefore, your best bet is to assume everything is a lie, because it's a continual attempt to protect their corruption from exposure.
If it makes me a big bad conspiracy theorist that I disbelieve the most corrupt world governments the history of the world has ever known, then so be it. You're a f'ing idiot if you believe everything you're told.
And another thing on censorship. The truth does not need protection through censorship. Only lies do. The truth can stand up to logical attacks if it is the truth. Lies cannot. So if something is being censored, the odds are 99.999999% that it's an inconvenient truth for those doing the censoring.
The main job of the government and intelligence agencies is to protect themselves, to grow their budgets and their power. They do this through lying about everything and creating more and bigger problems that the public agrees need to be solved. And of course it's an unwritten rule that only the government can solve problems, even though they never have and only ever make them worse by design. After all, if a problem were solved, the budget used to fix it would disappear. If the problem were made worse, the budget would increase. Therefore, the government always makes problems worse on purpose. I don't know how anyone could possibly argue against this logic.
Craig - You ever considered that you've fallen for the COINTELPRO agents?
It seems you might realise that and just keep mum about it, no?
With regards to the technology used on 9/11, you are missing the bigger picture!
Just as the hazardous and wasteful technology behind a nuclear bomb can also be used to provide hazardous and wasteful nuclear power, the the technology which caused the clean and effortless molecular dissociation of the twin towers could also be used to give the whole world effortless clean energy.
Exposing this clean free energy technology means and end to the ruling elite's ability to control and exploit the general population through scarce, expensive, dirty and inefficient resources such as oil, coal, nuclear and "renewables".
Any group with an interest in maintaining the current paradigm of artificial scarcity and crappy energy technologies, which keeps the general population enslaved, would have an interest in helping to maintain the 9/11 cover up, because exposing the crime also exposes the TECHNOLOGY to commit it.
Maybe the people who did 9/11 operate under a code of conduct where they have to show this technology to the people, so they have the opportunity to claim it.
And if the people are too stupid or apathetic to show any interest, they will then feel justified in keeping it for themselves and continuing to control and exploit the human herd, like the CATTLE they have shown themselves to be.
You might think it's insane, and it is, but remember we're talking about a group of people who are willing to turn skyscrapers to DUST, live on TV.
In the final analysis there is no "grand" deception" or cover up.
There is only BLUFF!
Because everyone can see what happened to the buildings was clearly and PROVABLY NOT a structural failure (collapse) or a conventional controlled demolition by ANY thermal or kinetic mechanism!
Official narrative – Jet fuel.
Option behind door no 1 – explosives,
door no 2 – thermite,
door no 3 – buried or mini nukes.
Just don’t look at where the EVIDENCE points to.
Most of the answers here: https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com
Why have you buried your head in the sand for the lat 12 years after writing your article, "THE JUDY WOOD ENIGMA: A DISCUSSION - A POLARIZING FIGURE IN 9/11 RESEARCH".
My take on your 2012 article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-and-the-debunking-olympics
Since then, no one to this day has been able to refute anything she presents...
After all Gage was refuted in 2008, 2011 and again in 2023 a couple of times already:
Read the article: REFUTATION OF GAGE'S GAME, by Elsa Schieder, PhD - https://elsaiselsa.substack.com/p/dr-judy-wood-refutation-of-gages-game
You can download Refutation of Gage’s Game in 2008 AND 2023:
https://truthsummit.info/media-files/DrJudyWood-refutation-RichardGage-claims.pdf
Let me know when we can schedule a friendly chat over Skype...
We have a lot to talk about with regards to the PentaCon, now that I've made contact with Adam Eisenberg. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/my-experience-at-the-pentagon-on-9-11-with-adam-eisenberg/id1536808571?i=1000601271537
In search for 9/11 accountability
Thank you - I have encountered some of these tactics. I was personally slandered within a 9/11 group. As far as I could tell, the rumors centered around me as a woman. I went out to (platonic) dinner once with a 9/11 activist, after which the rumor campaign apparently started.
For years now, I've had to deal with in-person harassment also. It's still going on. It involves what Tarpley called “surveillance role players." From my limited research and FOIA attempts, I think the quote from Tarpley is correct as far as the government entities behind the harassment. There's a fusion center in a town not far from where I live. Some private companies that receive federal money participate as well. For instance, I discovered a local company owns and leases some of the vehicles driven by harassers. This company receives funding from the GSA. At this point, there are probably many small companies making money from these activities across the USA.
Thank you for bringing attention to this.
Thank you for this crucial information, Craig. The psychopathic tyrants will go to extreme lengths to hold onto their perceived power. And in that category, unfortunately, are their cush-job-keeping career clown "experts" who will, for example, denounce vaxxes with plenty of corroborating and/or correlational evidence, but they refuse to openly point to the 10 million pound elephant in the room, germ theory. Why? Because even *questioning* it would likely end their career as they know it. Are these "experts" actually plants, or are they just fearful? Their popularity and lasting power in the fake truther community may provide the answer. The secret agencies know full well that the average person, as you say, has learned to not question the narrative outside of accepted mainstream discussion. Ah, the incrementalism.