What, no moon landing on the list? I guess they don't want to go there. I suppose people need something to believe in i.e. "At least we went to the moon!"
Dear Mr. McKee, You are well-versed on Philip Zelikow, his prior research interests, and his Executive Director influence on the 9/11 Commission Report, the many flaws of this publication such that even members of the commission do not stand behind it anymore.
The parallelism that is happening now is that Anna Paulina Luna is characterized as "a hardcore Zionist."
Given than 9/11 and Epstein (and even JFK) have Israeli angles that would make her appointment a conflict of interest, this has all the making of a bait-and-switch.
Trump appears to be giving back to those who bought him and control him, with a few scraps for the dogs (e.g., releasing the Jan 6 rioters). I recall getting beat up by you for VP Harris's silent support for Israeli measures in Gaza, with the promise that Trump would be better. For Israel, he is better, promising troops to clear out the remnant folk living in the Gaza rubble so that they won't be in the way of redevelopment into the Riviera of the Middle East (that son-in-law Kuschner is speculating into).
Here's hoping that Trump doesn't go to war with Canada to grab its resources and to jettison its highly popular medicare-for-all and free-education and other socialist items.
Trump's cryptocurrency and Musk's payment-for-everything app already present huge conflicts of interest when DOGE killed CFPB, which really did save Americans more money personally than it cost them in taxes. CFPB had banking regulation controls that both Musk and Trump don't want to be bother with; they are above the law.
"The parallelism that is happening now is that Anna Paulina Luna is characterized as "a hardcore Zionist."
Given than 9/11 and Epstein (and even JFK) have Israeli angles that would make her appointment a conflict of interest, this has all the making of a bait-and-switch."
Good point. We may only see a limited hangout. But does anyone really get anywhere in the political arena if they don't (or profess to) support Israel?
What, no moon landing on the list? I guess they don't want to go there. I suppose people need something to believe in i.e. "At least we went to the moon!"
I wondered about this, too. Is this lie just too big to admit to?
It's the last shred of hope. But I think sooner or later they will have to confess.
Even if nothing really comes from this enquiry at least it's an acknowledgement that we're not being told the truth.
Dear Mr. McKee, You are well-versed on Philip Zelikow, his prior research interests, and his Executive Director influence on the 9/11 Commission Report, the many flaws of this publication such that even members of the commission do not stand behind it anymore.
The parallelism that is happening now is that Anna Paulina Luna is characterized as "a hardcore Zionist."
Given than 9/11 and Epstein (and even JFK) have Israeli angles that would make her appointment a conflict of interest, this has all the making of a bait-and-switch.
Trump appears to be giving back to those who bought him and control him, with a few scraps for the dogs (e.g., releasing the Jan 6 rioters). I recall getting beat up by you for VP Harris's silent support for Israeli measures in Gaza, with the promise that Trump would be better. For Israel, he is better, promising troops to clear out the remnant folk living in the Gaza rubble so that they won't be in the way of redevelopment into the Riviera of the Middle East (that son-in-law Kuschner is speculating into).
Here's hoping that Trump doesn't go to war with Canada to grab its resources and to jettison its highly popular medicare-for-all and free-education and other socialist items.
Trump's cryptocurrency and Musk's payment-for-everything app already present huge conflicts of interest when DOGE killed CFPB, which really did save Americans more money personally than it cost them in taxes. CFPB had banking regulation controls that both Musk and Trump don't want to be bother with; they are above the law.
//
"The parallelism that is happening now is that Anna Paulina Luna is characterized as "a hardcore Zionist."
Given than 9/11 and Epstein (and even JFK) have Israeli angles that would make her appointment a conflict of interest, this has all the making of a bait-and-switch."
Good point. We may only see a limited hangout. But does anyone really get anywhere in the political arena if they don't (or profess to) support Israel?