I think you should tell Craig what you really thought of it. Seriously. Informative and creative and sentimental is a very minimal way of describing it. Do you have an opinion about it and about what happened at the Pentagon? Do you think it's an important topic? You are an adult who is surely allowed to express your opinion or is it because you work for AE that you can't express an opinion. If that is the case you can say it.
Thanks, Andy! I'm ancient enough to have watched the show during its original run. It was part of a rotating show called The NBC Mystery Movie. This included Columbo, McCloud (with Dennis Weaver), and McMillan and Wife (with Rock Hudson).
Dear Mr. McKee, a character in your story asks: "How could the pole be hit by the right wing and end up on the other side of the plane?"
If the breakaway pole, upon being hit and severed from its base by the plane's right wing, started the pole into an end-over-end spin, its ungangly shape at the proper angle in an off-balanced cartwheel could result in a trajectory into a different direction first time one of its ends hits the ground. When the energy and momentum vectors are considered for something ungangly put into a spin, outside forces acting on it (such as an end hitting the ground) could result in unpredictable further vectors of travel.
The issue seems to be, that the pole's vector of travel was 90 degrees from the aircraft's flight path and went 150 feet.
Dear Mr. 9/11 Revisionist, you wrote: "Your presentation will be such a bore..."
I can agree with that. Boring but informative.
You wrote: "You are a Richard Gage, Jim Fetzer, Ted Walter distraction agent..."
Every single person you've listed has reason to fear when my seeds from the presentation get watered by others.
You wrote: "Your conversation points are part of a subversion of irrefutable points regarding evidence."
FOUL ON THE PLAY! Hypnotic suggestion. No examples given. And upon closer inspection, demonstrates that those are your weaknesses that you attempt to project onto me.
You wrote: "If you were so certain of your points, you'd be able to take on the US government, yet you're being propped up by the disinformation peddlers."
If you weren't a ChatGPT bot, you'd recognize that this recycled point has no meaning or effect on me. That is your hobby-horse, not mine. But rest assured, when you ride your hobby-horse in front of the court to make your case, you better have my hobby-horse sitting in your saddle-bags.
You wrote: "You might be well versed, but your points raised are easily debunkable..."
Prove it (but not here). Go through my premise section by section, paragraph by paragraph, and demonstrate how easily debunkable it is.
Otherwise, just more hypnotic suggestion from you.
You wrote: "Thanx for playing."
Again with the projection. You are playing games. I, on the other hand, am sincere.
Craig - I think you need to listen to Adam Eisenberg....
Adam Eisenberg served as an infantryman with Alpha Company, 3rd US Infantry (The Old Guard) between September 11th - 30th, 2001, assisting in the security and cleanup efforts at the Pentagon.
Adam's professional working experience with aeronautical parts led him to discover some shocking anomalies between his first-responder experience and the official governmental narrative, both before and after the attack. This inspired deeper research and investigation into what he's now formally calling, The Orion Project.
Yes, I know Adam E. I collaborated with him for more than a year until he cut me and Adam Ruff loose for not promptly signing a non-disclosure agreement that he sent us. It's quite a document. It stipulated which court house we would have to go to in the event that he sued us. So much for trust.
Could it possibly be because you collaborate with the disinfo peddlers, architects for an engineered truth and Richard Gage? Adam and I just finished a very insightful 2h conversation.
We discussed you, Gage, Ted Walter Barbara, Chandler, Coste and all the "9/11 truther movement", "trusted expert" distractors...
No, it could not be that. My position never changed from the first time I talked to Adam until the last. Instead of offering us some contrived drama about a "storm," why don't you just say what you have to say. Otherwise don't say anything.
Dear Mr. 9/11 Revisionist, why are you calling out Mr. McKee's testicles for a conversation when you won't extend me the same courtesy. You have me blocked on substack. Not very objective or ballsy of you. //
Dear Mr. 9/11 Revisionist, Here's a couple more factoids about my efforts as "Señor El Once". I purchased and had sent copies of Dr. Wood's book to Mr. Craig McKee and Mr. David Chandler.
I did my part.
Yes, it was about the evidence.
Given that Dr. Wood has no theories and boasts of having no theories but all evidence, then that it where you need to focus.
My theory addresses her evidence. Ergo, you need to be bowing to me and taking up colors to promote and defend my theory now, because I've transported you beyond those limited hang-out premises, including Dr. Wood's "no conclusions."
Dear Mr. 9/11 Revisionist, You quoted a lot of text from Mr. McKee's "The Judy Wood Enigma" and the people who responded. One participant in particular that you quote from and even laud is "Señor El Once".
I was "Señor El Once".
I would have told you under that very posting, but YOU HAVE ME BLOCKED, because you are fearful of the way that I grab Dr. Wood's evidence and have my hobby-horse explain it even better that her "not-an-end-station."
That Columbo is a clever fella isn't he? He figured out a whole lot just by looking at the evidence and questioning what he was told. I wish more people were like Columbo. I heard in fact he has a few more questions now.
Finally got a chance to read this. Very informative and creative, and for me very sentimental as I've loved Columbo since I was a kid. Good work!
I think you should tell Craig what you really thought of it. Seriously. Informative and creative and sentimental is a very minimal way of describing it. Do you have an opinion about it and about what happened at the Pentagon? Do you think it's an important topic? You are an adult who is surely allowed to express your opinion or is it because you work for AE that you can't express an opinion. If that is the case you can say it.
Thanks, Andy! I'm ancient enough to have watched the show during its original run. It was part of a rotating show called The NBC Mystery Movie. This included Columbo, McCloud (with Dennis Weaver), and McMillan and Wife (with Rock Hudson).
Dear Mr. McKee, a character in your story asks: "How could the pole be hit by the right wing and end up on the other side of the plane?"
If the breakaway pole, upon being hit and severed from its base by the plane's right wing, started the pole into an end-over-end spin, its ungangly shape at the proper angle in an off-balanced cartwheel could result in a trajectory into a different direction first time one of its ends hits the ground. When the energy and momentum vectors are considered for something ungangly put into a spin, outside forces acting on it (such as an end hitting the ground) could result in unpredictable further vectors of travel.
The issue seems to be, that the pole's vector of travel was 90 degrees from the aircraft's flight path and went 150 feet.
//
Yes, you have nailed this detail. There is no way the pole could have gone to the left and 150 feet up the road.
Your presentation will be such a bore...
You are a Richard Gage, Jim Fetzer, Ted Walter distraction agent...
Your conversation points are part of a subversion of irrefutable points regarding evidence.
If you were so certain of your points, you'd be able to take on the US government, yet you're being propped up by the disinformation peddlers.
You might be well versed, but your points raised are easily debunkable...
Thanx for playing.
Dear Mr. 9/11 Revisionist, you wrote: "Your presentation will be such a bore..."
I can agree with that. Boring but informative.
You wrote: "You are a Richard Gage, Jim Fetzer, Ted Walter distraction agent..."
Every single person you've listed has reason to fear when my seeds from the presentation get watered by others.
You wrote: "Your conversation points are part of a subversion of irrefutable points regarding evidence."
FOUL ON THE PLAY! Hypnotic suggestion. No examples given. And upon closer inspection, demonstrates that those are your weaknesses that you attempt to project onto me.
You wrote: "If you were so certain of your points, you'd be able to take on the US government, yet you're being propped up by the disinformation peddlers."
If you weren't a ChatGPT bot, you'd recognize that this recycled point has no meaning or effect on me. That is your hobby-horse, not mine. But rest assured, when you ride your hobby-horse in front of the court to make your case, you better have my hobby-horse sitting in your saddle-bags.
You wrote: "You might be well versed, but your points raised are easily debunkable..."
Prove it (but not here). Go through my premise section by section, paragraph by paragraph, and demonstrate how easily debunkable it is.
Otherwise, just more hypnotic suggestion from you.
You wrote: "Thanx for playing."
Again with the projection. You are playing games. I, on the other hand, am sincere.
//
Craig - I think you need to listen to Adam Eisenberg....
Adam Eisenberg served as an infantryman with Alpha Company, 3rd US Infantry (The Old Guard) between September 11th - 30th, 2001, assisting in the security and cleanup efforts at the Pentagon.
Adam's professional working experience with aeronautical parts led him to discover some shocking anomalies between his first-responder experience and the official governmental narrative, both before and after the attack. This inspired deeper research and investigation into what he's now formally calling, The Orion Project.
Adam is now here to report on what he's uncovered and intends to prompt a new investigation to finally hold the guilty parties of September 11th accountable. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/my-experience-at-the-pentagon-on-9-11-with-adam-eisenberg/id1536808571?i=1000601271537
The PentaCon on 9/11
When even a missile did not hit a target
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/the-pentacon-on-911
Yes, I know Adam E. I collaborated with him for more than a year until he cut me and Adam Ruff loose for not promptly signing a non-disclosure agreement that he sent us. It's quite a document. It stipulated which court house we would have to go to in the event that he sued us. So much for trust.
Could it possibly be because you collaborate with the disinfo peddlers, architects for an engineered truth and Richard Gage? Adam and I just finished a very insightful 2h conversation.
We discussed you, Gage, Ted Walter Barbara, Chandler, Coste and all the "9/11 truther movement", "trusted expert" distractors...
Let's just say - A STORM IS COMING
No, it could not be that. My position never changed from the first time I talked to Adam until the last. Instead of offering us some contrived drama about a "storm," why don't you just say what you have to say. Otherwise don't say anything.
Craig - I'm wondering - Do you have the balls to have a conversation with me?
I have a multitude of questions for you...
We at least do have common ground with regards to the PentaCon and the Ted Walter group...
You willing to have a conversation with a dumb African?
Dear Mr. 9/11 Revisionist, why are you calling out Mr. McKee's testicles for a conversation when you won't extend me the same courtesy. You have me blocked on substack. Not very objective or ballsy of you. //
O, I have a lot to say sweetie...
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-and-the-debunking-olympics
Dear Mr. 9/11 Revisionist, Here's a couple more factoids about my efforts as "Señor El Once". I purchased and had sent copies of Dr. Wood's book to Mr. Craig McKee and Mr. David Chandler.
I did my part.
Yes, it was about the evidence.
Given that Dr. Wood has no theories and boasts of having no theories but all evidence, then that it where you need to focus.
My theory addresses her evidence. Ergo, you need to be bowing to me and taking up colors to promote and defend my theory now, because I've transported you beyond those limited hang-out premises, including Dr. Wood's "no conclusions."
Kiss my ring, nave!
//
Dear Mr. 9/11 Revisionist, You quoted a lot of text from Mr. McKee's "The Judy Wood Enigma" and the people who responded. One participant in particular that you quote from and even laud is "Señor El Once".
I was "Señor El Once".
I would have told you under that very posting, but YOU HAVE ME BLOCKED, because you are fearful of the way that I grab Dr. Wood's evidence and have my hobby-horse explain it even better that her "not-an-end-station."
//
So here we go with all the sudden off topic posts in 3...2...1...
That Columbo is a clever fella isn't he? He figured out a whole lot just by looking at the evidence and questioning what he was told. I wish more people were like Columbo. I heard in fact he has a few more questions now.
Yes, there are some other areas of 9/11 evidence that he could look at.