T&S episode 10: Early years of the Pentagon Cabal, w/ Adam Syed
https://rumble.com/v4xghxn-truth-and-shadows-the-early-years-of-the-pentagon-cabal-w-adam-syed.html
In this very special episode of the Truth and Shadows podcast, Adam Ruff and I are joined by longtime ally Adam Syed to discuss the early years of the disinformation campaign that continues to distort and suppress the essential evidence that no 757 hit the Pentagon on 9/11.
Both Adams were in the trenches fighting against this campaign, which is being carried out by a cabal of purported truthers who want us to accept almost all of the Pentagon official story.
A number of sources were mentioned.
My two-part examination of the Lloyde England evidence:
https://truthandshadows.com/2019/03/20/lloyde-englands-tall-pentagon-tale-part-1/
https://truthandshadows.com/2019/04/28/coste-chandler-fraud-about-england-part-2/
On the Consensus Panel:
https://truthandshadows.com/2012/05/02/consensus-911-panel-resignations/
https://truthandshadows.com/2011/12/02/breaking-the-back-of-the-official-story-911-consensus-panel-cant-be-timid/
And on the Cabal:
https://truthandshadows.com/2018/09/04/cabal-props-up-pentagon-official-story/
https://truthandshadows.com/2019/02/13/most-persistent-911-threat/
https://truthandshadows.com/2012/05/21/pentagon-fight-used-against-911-truth-movement/
Thanks for supporting the channel! – Craig McKee
Thanks for looking back at the history of 9/11 blogger and your continued work focusing on what happened at the Pentagon. (As I commented before...) Everyone should check out CIT's research on the Pentagon, which is great citizen journalism.
Dear Mr. McKee, the dynamic trio was pretty good in this episode. A point missed with 9/11 blogger is that, whereas the Pentagon discussion had heavy-handed banning, the number of participants (and wanna-be participants) interested in legitimately exploring nuclear and DEW grew to the point where the plug had to be pulled on the forum. Even when promoted purposely with error (which predecessor nuclear premises contained and Dr. Wood's non-conclusions demonstrate), it is sufficient to undermine the established consensus 9/11 theories promoted by the same cabal that you complain about at the Pentagon.
I'm glad that you did not divide this discussion into smaller chunks. Some discussions need to go long.
And for what it is worth, the play-back level of your intro is much higher than the discussion and goes on for too long (1 minutes). Very annoying. I skip.
If I were to give recommendations on alternative theme songs:
Spiro: https://realworldrecords.com/artists/spiro/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2V0z5Ke24E
Joi: https://realworldrecords.com/artists/joi/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FUOAGujsiI
The trio has had years to study my work, and failing that, the Boston 9/11 Truth presentation is an excellent opportunity to come up to speed.
Mr. Ruff is a little misguided when he makes "real name" versus "pseudonym" arguments in an attempt to disparage view points of others.
But because it is you, Mr. McKee, and the other duo in your trio also has internet legacy with me, I'd consider turning on my camera for my presentation.
Pun intended, but this is what is going to "nuclear energize" all related 9/11 Truth activism.
//